“I find it fascinating how in the Netherlands, for example, the Early Music movement has been influencing the modern orchestras.
When Frans Brüggen was protesting at concert halls – saying that their interpretations of Mozart are lies – the connection between these two streams of thinking was not happening yet. And since then, as we see today in most Dutch orchestras, they use much less vibrato in 18th century repertoire than orchestras of most other countries, especially those outside of Europe.
This has been a formative part of modern Dutch culture; that the Early Music movement has had an equivalent place in society as modern performance practice, at least from my non-European perspective. Outside of Europe, in countries which are physically and population-wise far larger than European countries, Early Music and perfor-mance practice as still seen as a sort of fringe thing, which is a shame.”
“It is a paradox that we have also come to work with modern ensembles, equipped with metal strings and modern instruments, playing Early Music, while adhering to all the principles of historically informed performance.
One example is the Resonanz ensemble in Hamburg: they perform Mozart’s Symphonies on modern instruments, with the exception of the horns. They were able to undertake this approach through their collaboration with Riccardo Minasi – a conductor who has mastered historically informed practices with such insight that he imparts it to the musicians, discussing theatre, rhetoric, and everything that brings this music to life.
The fact that today, so-called ‘conventional’ orchestras can once again confront a repertoire they were increasingly hesitant to approach is quite fascinating. And even more fascinating because we are certain of one thing: total authenticity is an unattainable ideal, a pure fantasy.”
CHRISTIAN GIRARDIN
Transmission
Despite an educated audience and increased training opportunities, everyday life support is in decline:
“What we have gained tremendously is that in any conservatory, you can discover Early Music as a child. That wasn’t the case in my time; we only had standard, modern instruments. I don’t know where you had to go – to Paris? – to come across a harpsichord, but it wasn’t easy.
[…] What I liked in my time was having an association of music lovers with parents who lent a hand, and young adults who sang in the children’s choir, took charge of their concert season, programs, organisation, etc. Now, as a child in the Vosges, you have to go through a conservatory to sing in the conservatory’s children’s choir.
[…] What we gained in conservatories with plenty of choices for Early Music now, we lost in the network of Pueri Cantores or children’s choirs, which, when they no longer have the support of an educational or religious structure, cease to exist. Because it exhausted local resources, we also lost this local history, as they have in Germanic countries, with choral societies, village music societies
[…] We would have to start from scratch, rebuild them, find subsidies, premises, support, and recruit people. Because it requires a lot of investment, and people no longer want to do it [voluntarily]. There is what is needed in conservatories, so it is considered that we entrust it to the conservatories. And for me, it was not at all the same project, nor the same flavour. Frankly, if I were a child in the Vosges now, I think I wouldn’t have this openness. I wouldn’t have followed the same path.”
LUCILE RICHARDOT
Throughout the interviews, Early Music’s idiosyncrasies reveal themselves in both similar and diverse ways, like a mirage on the horizon, always just out of reach. It is not the destination that matters; it is the journey.
These conversations unveil a treasure shared by those who live with Early Music daily – in repeated gestures or the exceptional experience of a concert. It is a centre of gravity, a cornerstone, a private core. Yet, these stones are vibrant and resonate and speak: Early Music carries strong, physical convictions, and as a result, it becomes a driving force for personal and professional projects, a life dedicated to the pursuit of beauty and its sublimation in sharing with others.
These others are the very condition for gaining perspective on Early Music, whether in research, scientific or empirical or in collective practice with the audience.
The depth – the power – of Early Music then emerges and breaks down our barriers as beings in time and space. Its ‘tempo di fuga’ is not that of escape in the sense of evasion but of an opening that has no end, of a horizon endlessly renewed.
This study draws a subjective, intuitive picture of Early music as something that eludes restrictive definitions, well-established chronologies, and boldly claims its sense of risk and passion for freedom.
Why do we need such a treasure? Why have men and women born under diverse skies, who per-haps should never have met, converged toward Early Music and then carried it to the ends of the Earth? Here, too, the words of Patrick Boucheron are fitting:
“We need history because we need rest: a pause to rest our consciousness, so that the possibility of a consciousness may remain – as the seat not only of thought, but also of practical reason, affording full latitude for action.
Saving the past, saving time from the frenzy of the present: the poets devote themselves with exactitude to this.”
PATRICK BOUCHERON
And undoubtedly, in doing so, these poets strive to save both the present and the future in the same art of movement, through art in motion.
- The complete REMA 2023 study : Early Music : The art of movement, art of motion



You must be logged in to be able to post comments.
Sign in